136
136
Aug 10, 2013
08/13
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 136
favorite 0
quote 0
nationstates. you know that. criminal elements. the third group that i have trouble defining --anarchists, activists, anonymous, will sec, 20 somethings that have not talked to the opposite sex in five or six years. [laughter] blessedly, the capacity to do harm is pretty much the way i laid out the taxonomy. governments are by far most confident. criminal gangs are the next layer. then you have this group down here. as bad as governments could be, sooner or later they can be held to account. you have got criminal elements, and they can be pretty dangerous and they are kind of guns for hire, but fundamentally, criminals want to make money. they enter into a symbiotic relation with whatever their target is. and it is a strange creature, a strange parasite in nature who enters into a symbiotic relationship with a host they want to kill or destroy. so i think even criminals are somewhat limited. what worries me is this game down here. right now they are least capable, but you know better than i, the tide is coming in on all the boats i
nationstates. you know that. criminal elements. the third group that i have trouble defining --anarchists, activists, anonymous, will sec, 20 somethings that have not talked to the opposite sex in five or six years. [laughter] blessedly, the capacity to do harm is pretty much the way i laid out the taxonomy. governments are by far most confident. criminal gangs are the next layer. then you have this group down here. as bad as governments could be, sooner or later they can be held to account....
50
50
Aug 7, 2013
08/13
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 50
favorite 0
quote 0
nationstates. you know that. criminal elements. the third group that i have trouble defining come a anarchists, activists, anonymous, will sec, 20 somethings that have not talked to the opposite sex in five or six years. [laughter] blessedly, the capacity to do harm is pretty much the way i laid out. governments are by far most confident. criminal gangs are the next layer. then you have this group down here. as bad as governments could be, sooner or later they can be held to account. you have got criminal elements, and they can be pretty dangerous and they are kind of guns for higher, but fundamentally, criminals want to make money. they enter into a symbiotic relation with whatever their target is. and it is a strange creature, a strange parasite in nature who enters into a symbiotic relationship with a host they want to kill or destroy. so i think even criminals are somewhat limited. what worries me is this game down here. right now their least capable, but you know better than i, the tide is coming in on all the boats in the har
nationstates. you know that. criminal elements. the third group that i have trouble defining come a anarchists, activists, anonymous, will sec, 20 somethings that have not talked to the opposite sex in five or six years. [laughter] blessedly, the capacity to do harm is pretty much the way i laid out. governments are by far most confident. criminal gangs are the next layer. then you have this group down here. as bad as governments could be, sooner or later they can be held to account. you have...
53
53
Aug 10, 2013
08/13
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 53
favorite 0
quote 0
will talk about that, we move away from some of the nationstate stuff. that is the sexy stuff and general hayden did a wonderful job covering bad. we will move to some of the not quite as sexy information about how we calculate risk, will we deal with that, how are .tandards set should we have minimum standards? do those minimum standards get in the way question mark those types of questions we will get into with this panel. one of the things we know when one of the things the bbc set up set up early on is to know we do not have all the answers. talk about the fact that cybersecurity is, in fact, a journey and not a destination. we will not reach an end date like y2k where we say ok, we did it right. some very bright people out there, lots of it has to do with ownership, some of it has to do with bad actors. we do have to asked ourselves, when we look at compliance , does that compliance actually drive the bar down perhaps? should we be looking at another way to do this? as we look at that, understanding you have doe, department of homeland security, com
will talk about that, we move away from some of the nationstate stuff. that is the sexy stuff and general hayden did a wonderful job covering bad. we will move to some of the not quite as sexy information about how we calculate risk, will we deal with that, how are .tandards set should we have minimum standards? do those minimum standards get in the way question mark those types of questions we will get into with this panel. one of the things we know when one of the things the bbc set up set up...
67
67
Aug 4, 2013
08/13
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 67
favorite 0
quote 0
if you think about it from a state perspective, is it a nationstate? is it an activist organization? is it an insider that is disgruntled? if we are going to put these issues in the context of risk management, which at the end of the day is what this is about, you have to spend some time thinking about what is your most likely attacker? even then, what is that attacker likely to target? one of the greatest issues i see is that we try to apply all threats to all problems. we try to say that all data is critical within an organization. and really, to manage this issue properly, we have to be beyond that and put it in a framework that we can understand and manage. the threat and impact, looking at the impact of the particular tech should also -- particular attacks also drive drive the resources. would be a cash traffic impact because it is targeting a prickle architecture -- a critical architecture? or is it an embarrassment to the organization based on data being released or sensitive information being released? do this without thinking about the impact
if you think about it from a state perspective, is it a nationstate? is it an activist organization? is it an insider that is disgruntled? if we are going to put these issues in the context of risk management, which at the end of the day is what this is about, you have to spend some time thinking about what is your most likely attacker? even then, what is that attacker likely to target? one of the greatest issues i see is that we try to apply all threats to all problems. we try to say that all...
123
123
Aug 17, 2013
08/13
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 123
favorite 0
quote 0
first i think the rosen of the nationstate and the spreading of the crisis of terrorism and to are africa and out shabbat conducting this last saturday. attack a human group were they claimed they killed americans. that is totally false. american life is very much at stake. my greatest worry of just continuity has to do with weapons of maps the structure and -- weapons of mass destruction. we have three administrations. we have loose weapons. we have some of the trends in areas and states who want nuclear weapons. they give this to the previous panel. i think they defended very well and the legality of what we have been doing that has been the subject of such great concern. those are great issue. john talked about east asia and china. china is not an enemy. a major trading partner. we do have to get right the cyber issue would china that has now been talked about publicly by the director of national intelligence and others. take theo also get, whole issue of defense modernization, all of which could lead to some real potential abrupt changes over the pacific and asia. we have been so focu
first i think the rosen of the nationstate and the spreading of the crisis of terrorism and to are africa and out shabbat conducting this last saturday. attack a human group were they claimed they killed americans. that is totally false. american life is very much at stake. my greatest worry of just continuity has to do with weapons of maps the structure and -- weapons of mass destruction. we have three administrations. we have loose weapons. we have some of the trends in areas and states who...
69
69
Aug 5, 2013
08/13
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 69
favorite 0
quote 0
if you think about it from a state perspective, is it a nationstate? is it an activist organization? and really, to manage this issue properly, we have to be beyond that and put it in a framework that we can understand and manage. the threat and impact, looking at the impact of the particular tech should also -- particular attacks also drive drive the resources. would be a cash traffic impact because it is targeting a prickle architecture -- a critical architecture? or is it an embarrassment to the organization based on data being released or sensitive information being released? we can't do this without thinking about the impact of these attacks. the third kind of critical component is thinking about for -- thinking about vulnerabilities. the vulnerability impairment is something that needs to be managed with regards to what systems are in use, how they are used and what is the vulnerability profile. when we look at the attack to take place even with the most sophisticated the space best of the state-sponsored attacks, they don't have to bring their a
if you think about it from a state perspective, is it a nationstate? is it an activist organization? and really, to manage this issue properly, we have to be beyond that and put it in a framework that we can understand and manage. the threat and impact, looking at the impact of the particular tech should also -- particular attacks also drive drive the resources. would be a cash traffic impact because it is targeting a prickle architecture -- a critical architecture? or is it an embarrassment to...